Forms are Simple

All the code is refactored and shiny. The tests look nice and we have the beginnings of a framework but we’ve only completed one story. Let’s work on the next one.

  • An author can publish a blog post.

I’ve been using (and loving!) the simple_form gem for a while now. It’s one of the things that I miss most about moving to React. Let’s see how hard it is to reproduce some of that functionality here. There are a lot of moving parts.

We’ll do the rails bit first because it is easy.

  test 'create a blog post' do
    post posts_url(format: :json), params: {
        post: {
            title: 'A new day',
            body: 'First post!'
        }
    }
    assert_response :success
    json = JSON.parse response.body, symbolize_names: true

    # The post was created
    @post = Post.last
    assert_equal 'A new day', @post.title

    # Return the post as JSON
    assert_equal @post.id, json[:id]
    assert_equal 'A new day', json[:title]
  end
class PostsController < ApplicationController
  def create
    @post = Post.new post_params
    if @post.save
      render :show
    else
      render json: @post.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity
    end
  end
...

Now we need a form in React to submit a post.

class PostTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
  test 'post has a title and a body'
  test 'validate the title and body'
  test 'trim the title and body'
end

We’ll use the strip_attributes gem to trim the fields.

# Gemfile 
gem 'strip_attributes'
bundle install
class Post < ApplicationRecord
  strip_attributes
  validates :title, length: { minimum: 2, maximum: 255}
  validates :body,  length: { minimum: 2}
end

We’ll work on the client side tomorrow.

No more boilerplate!

While I am in a tidying mood, that ConnectedPost looks a lot like boilerplate. Surely we can extract some of that away?

Here’s how it looks now.

export default class ConnectedPost extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    this.state = {
      post: {}
    }
  }

  render() {
    const {post} = this.state
    return <Post post={post} />
  }

  async componentDidMount() {
    const post = await fetchPost(1)
    this.setState({post})
  }
}

It’s all just xxxxx post xxx Post …..fetchPost. Maybe that’s the start of a framework? Let’s try a higher-order component (HOC) the way that Redux does for connected components.

I want a function that will wrap my Post component and call fetchPost when it mounts. I’ll call it like this:

export default connect(Post, fetchPost)

I don’t know how to do this incrementally so I’ll just go for it.

import React from 'react'

export function connect(WrappedComponent, fetch) {
  return class extends React.Component {
    constructor(props) {
      super(props)

      this.type = WrappedComponent.name.toLowerCase()
      this.state = {
        model: {}
      }
    }

    render() {     
      const props = {
        [this.type]: this.state.model
      }
      return <WrappedComponent {...props} />
    }

    async componentDidMount() {
      const model = await fetch(1)
      this.setState({model})
    }
  }
}

It does exactly the same as it did before except, now it will do it for any model-view-api, not just for Posts.

Wait! What is that “1” doing in there? That could just be a property on the WrappedComponent.

    async componentDidMount() {
      const model = await fetch(this.props.id)
      this.setState({model})
    }

While we are here, api.js is a bit boilerplatey too. Can we can use convention-over-configuration to fetch models too?

We can. All of my rails routes take the form `/:pluralized_model_name/:id’. Let’s use that to make a generalized fetch() function.

import {server} from 'remote/server'

export function fetch(type, id) {
  return server.send(urlFor(type, id))
}

function urlFor(type, id) {
  return `/${type}s/${id}.json`
}

And we can call it with…

    async componentDidMount() {
      const model = await fetch(this.type, this.props.id)
      this.setState({model})
    }

I think that’s enough tidying for now. Let’s get back to building features for our blogging platform.

Tests are code too

I’m going to do an experiment on a branch to see if I can make the interface for testing a little easier to read. I want something bit more like assert_select in Rails.

Let’s see now. Pretending it’s magic…

  test('shows the first blog post', async () => {
    const component = await mount(<Application />)
    
    check(component).has(
        {
          '.site-name':   'Blogging', 
          '.post .title': 'React on Rails', 
          '.post .body':  'I can use React with Rails.', 
        }
    )
  })

Or, how about this?

  test('also shows the first blog post', async () => {
    const component = await mount(<Application />)
    assert_select(component, '.site-name',   'Blogging')
    assert_select(component, '.post .title', 'React on Rails')
    assert_select(component, '.post .body',  'I can use React with Rails.')
  })

assert_select allows nesting. Maybe something like this?

 test('shows the first blog post with nesting', async () => {
    const component = await mount(<Application />)

    assert_select(component, '.site-name',   'Blogging')
    assert_select(component, '.post', match => {
      assert_select(match, '.title', 'React on Rails')
      assert_select(match, '.body', 'I can use React with Rails.')
    })
  })

Let’s try the simple (non-nested) version for a while to see how it feels. Here’s a quick implementation.

export function assert_select(component, selector, expectation) {
  const selected = component.find(selector)
  switch(typeof(expectation)) {
    case 'string':
      expect(selected.text()).toEqual(expectation)
      break
    case 'number':
      expect(selected.length).toEqual(expectation)
      break
    default:
      expect(expectation).toEqual('string or number')
      break
  }
}

Let’s see how it goes. I’ll extract this into a ReactHelper along with a wrapper function for mount() that I will call display().

A Request to be Mocked

We’re starting the day with a failure.

The application test fails because it is trying to make a network request and, as everyone knows, we don’t want to make network requests in unit tests.

I suppose I could change the Application.test to use shallow() instead of mount() but then we wouldn’t actually be testing very much — and we’ll have to deal with this network request problem eventually.

Axios comes with an API for mocking network requests but that all feels a bit low-level to me.

What I’d like to do is refactor the code so that it is easy to switch out the network layer entirely when we are testing. Let’s introduce an API layer with a function to fetch posts.

We’ll start by extracting a method fetchPost(), then convert it to be an async function and await the response in componentDidMount(). Then, finally, we’ll move the function to its own file.

I’ll just show the final result.

// posts/api.js
import * as axios from 'axios'

export function fetchPost(id) {
  const request = {
    url: `http://localhost:3000/posts/${id}.json`
  }
  return axios(request).then(response => response.data)
}
  async componentDidMount() {
    const post = await fetchPost(1)
    this.setState({post})
  }

EXPLAIN PROMISES

EXPLAIN ASYNC

We’re not done yet because I’d like to introduce one more level of indirection. I want to abstract away the call to the server partly because this code will end up being used in a bunch of places and partly because that’s where I want to introduce my cleavage point for mocking.

All problems in computer science can be solved by another level of indirection.

David Wheeler
// remote/server.js
import * as axios from 'axios'

export const server = {send}
function send(url) {
  const request = {url}
  return axios(request).then(response => response.data)
}

// posts.api.js
import {server} from 'remote/server'

export function fetchPost(id) {
  return server.send(`/posts/${id}.json`)
}

There. That looks much nicer and now we are finally ready to mock out that server connection In Application.test.jsx.

import {Application} from 'application/Application'
import {server} from 'remote/server'

describe('The application', () => {
  server.send = jest.fn()

  beforeEach( () => {
    const post = {
      id: 1,
      title: 'React on Rails',
      body: 'I can use React with Rails.',
    }
    server.send.mockReturnValue(post)
  })

  test('shows the first blog post', async () => {
    const component = await mount(<Application />)

    expect(component.find('.site-name').text()).toEqual('Blogging')
    expect(component.find('.title').text()).toEqual('React on Rails')
    expect(component.find('.body').text()).toEqual('I can use React with Rails.')

    expect(server.send).toBeCalledWith('/posts/1.json')
  })
})

EXPLAIN jest.fn()

ADD A PASSED banner

Meet me in the Middle?

Story so far:

  • We have a Rails back end that can serialize a blog post to JSON.
  • We have a React front end that can render a blog post.

In this instalment, we want to connect the two together. Let’s do a bit of tidying first.

It sucks that our Application component is doing everything. I think we need a Post component to take care of the post stuff. Let’s extract one. Test first.

I’ll start by copy-pasting application/Application.test.jsx to posts/Post.test.jsx and then stripping out the non-post stuff.

describe('The post component', () => {
  test('shows a blog post', () => {
    const component = mount(<Post />)
    expect(component.find('.title').text()).toBe('React on Rails')
    expect(component.find('.body').text()).toBe('I can use React with Rails.')
  })
})

I’ll do the same thing with a Post component and check that all the tests still pass.

describe('The post component', () => {
  test('shows a blog post', () => {
    const component = mount(<Post />)
    expect(component.find('.title').text()).toBe('React on Rails')
    expect(component.find('.body').text()).toBe('I can use React with Rails.')
  })
})

Now I’ll change Application to use the Post component and get rid of the duplication.

import React from 'react'
import {Post} from 'posts/Post'

export function Application(_props) {
  return <div id='application'>
    <h1 className='site-name'>Blogging</h1>
    <Post />
  </div>
}

The tests still pass. Refactoring successful. There’s some overlap between Application.test and Post.test but I’m OK with that.

We’re almost ready to hook the Post component up to the backend but there’s one more fake it step we can take on the road to making it. Let’s pass the post data into the Post component so it doesn’t need to concern itself with where its data came from. Small steps are the best steps.

I’m going to introduce a mediating component between Application and Post that will be responsible for fetching the data. Here it is (the data is still hard coded for the moment).

export function Post({post}) {
  return <div className='post'>
    <h2 className='title'>{post.title}</h2>
    <div className='body'>{post.body}</div>
  </div>
}

export default function ConnectedPost() {
  const post = {
    id: 1,
    title: 'React on Rails',
    body: 'I can use React with Rails.',
  }
  return <Post post={post} />
}

Notice that I used the default modifier when I exported the ConnectedPost. You can export multiple components (or functions or constants or whatever) from each Javascript file but only one of them can be the default.

When you import a component from another file, you can use named imports like this:

// Application.jsx
import {Post} from 'posts/Post'
...
<Post />

If I skip the braces and import the default export (ConnectedPost), I can call it whatever name I like. I’m gonna continue to call it Post, like this:

// Application.jsx
import Post from 'posts/Post'
...
<Post />

Now that the post object is no longer hard-coded, we can update Post.test.jsx as a unit test for Post and pass the post in from the outside. We’ll test the ConnectedPost separately later.

  const post = {
    id: 1,
    title: 'The title',
    body: 'The body.',
  }

  test('shows a blog post', () => {
    const component = mount(<Post post={post}/>)
    expect(component.find('.title').text()).toEqual('The title')
    expect(component.find('.body').text()).toEqual('The body.')
  })

Before do the next interesting change I need to introduce some new concepts. Let’s start with class components.

Class components

All of our components so far have been stateless so it makes sense that they are pure functions. We’ll need to maintain state for our ConnectedPost when it retrieves data from the server so we are going to convert it to a class component.

Aside: The React folks have added hooks to allow you to maintain state in a functional component but the whole things still feels weird to me. I’m sticking with class components for now.

export default class ConnectedPost extends React.Component {
  render() {
    const post = {
      id: 1,
      title: 'React on Rails',
      body: 'I can use React with Rails.',
    }
    return <Post post={post} />
  }
}

This class component is exactly equivalent to the functional component that it replaced with all the rendering logic moved into a method called render(). But the class component gives us two new capabilities. The first is state management.

State Management

State management lets us keep track of internal changes to the component for when the user checks a box or presses a button. In our case, we are going to keep track of the post that we are fetching from the server.

There are three aspects to state management.

  1. Initialize the state in the constructor.
  2. Access the state in the render() method (and other methods as necessary).
  3. Change the current state with this.setState().

The reason we are letting React manage our state rather than just maintaining an instance variable is to give React the chance to re-render our component every time the state changes.

Let’s look at the first two together. I’ll change the component to initialize the state with an empty post in the constructor and then access that post in the render() method.

export default class ConnectedPost extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)
    this.state = {
      post: {}
    }
  }

  render() {
    const {post} = this.state
    return <Post post={post} />
  }
}

Before I show you how to change the state, let me introduce the second capability of class components.

Lifecycle methods

The second new capability of class components is lifecycle methods. Lifecycle methods get called when a component is initialized or when some external event happens that the component needs to know about. The most important lifecycle method is componentDidMount().

Let’s use it now to change the state when the component is first mounted.

export default class ConnectedPost extends React.Component {
 ...
  componentDidMount() {
    const post = {
      id: 1,
      title: 'React on Rails',
      body: 'I can use React with Rails.',
    }
    this.setState({post})
  }
}

We’re now exactly back to where we started but now we have a place to call out to the server to fetch out post. Let’s do it.

  componentDidMount() {
    const request = {
      url: 'http://localhost:3000/posts/1.json'
    }

    return axios(request).then(response => {
      const post = response.data
      this.setState({post})
    })
  }

I’m using axios rather than fetch. My reasons are lost in the mists of time but I remember that fetch did something weird with 404 errors that I found annoying.

We have to install axios with Yarn…

yarn add axios

…and import it at the top of the Post.jsx file.

import * as axios from 'axios'

We are finally displaying an actual blog post that we loaded from the server but the way we are doing it now means that all our tests are broken.

We’ll fix that tomorrow.

Testing with Jest and Enzyme

I find it hard to do test first with UI components because I’m always in such a rush to see what the UI will look like. But test last is better than no test, so let’s test now.

Jest is a unit testing library for Javascript and Enzyme provides an adapter that lets you interact with React components from your test code. We’ll install them using the Yarn package manager.

yarn add -dev jest 
yarn add -dev enzyme enzyme-adapter-react-16

Let’s create a test for our Application component.

import React from 'react'
import {mount} from 'enzyme'
import {configure} from 'enzyme'
import Adapter from 'enzyme-adapter-react-16'
configure({ adapter: new Adapter() })

import {Application} from 'application/Application'

describe('The application', () => {
  test('shows the first blog post', () => {
    const component = mount(<Application />)

    expect(component.find('.site-name').text()).toBe('Blogging')
    expect(component.find('.title').text()).toBe('React on Rails')
    expect(component.find('.body').text()).toBe('I can use React with Rails.')
  })
})

mount() will instantiate your component, call all the React lifecycle methods (we’ll cover this later), render it and make the component available for you to write assertions against.

A note about rendering components with Enzyme.

Enzyme has three different methods for rendering a React component:

  • shallow(<C />) renders C but not its child components.
  • mount(<C />) renders C and, recursively, all of its children.
  • render(<C />) renders just the component’s HTML.

It took me a long time to realize that these three methods do totally different things and have a totally different API. This confused the hell out of me for weeks. Once I realized that, I decided to just stick with mount() unless I have a very good reason to just do a shallow rendering which, so far, is never.

A Minor rant

Way back when the first JUnit extensions appeared that let you write tests in pseudo-English so that you could have your customer read them or maybe even write them, Ron Jeffries said that this was a dead end. Pseudo-English would always have an uncanny valley feel about it; the tests would be hard to read and harder to write. If programmers write tests, better that they use normal programming conventions that programmers can understand.

I didn’t listen.

After struggling mightily with Fit, Fitnesse, Cucumber, RSpec and God knows what else, I decided that maybe Ron had a point and went back to plain JUnit-style assertions.

I don’t know about you, but I find this…

assert_equal 'Blogging', component.find('.site-name').text()

…much easier to read (and write) than…

expect(component.find('.site-name').text()).toBe('Blogging')

Even better would be…

assert_select '.site-name', 'Blogging'

…and maybe I’ll do something about that one day.

In 20-something years, I’ve never had a customer who was interested in reading — nevermind writing — these tests. Just write your best ruby/javascript/whatever and give the tests good names. It will be OK.

Running the tests

We have to tell Jest where to find the tests. Create jest.config.js in the root of your rails app.

// jest.config.js
module.exports = {
  moduleDirectories: [
    "node_modules",
    "app/javascript"
  ],

  rootDir: 'test/javascript',
  clearMocks: true,
  coverageDirectory: "test/results/coverage",
  testMatch: [
    "**/*.test.jsx",
  ],
}

We can run the test with

yarn jest

Continuous Integration

If you sign in to CircleCI via your GitHub account, you can have CircleCI run your tests for you.

Click Set Up Project then follow the instructions to add the CircleCI config file to your project. I won’t repeat them here. If you are lucky, it will work first time.

If you are unlucky like me, you’ll have to copy a working config.xml from somewhere else. You can copy mine if you like. I had to add minitest-ci to my Gemfile to get the test results to show up. I got there in the end.

If you want to be really fancy, you can add the little badge that CircleCI generates to your README.md file.

Here’s mine:

And here it is on GitHub:

https://github.com/klawrence/blogging

Time to write some more code.

In the next installment, we’ll hook our React component up to use our Rails JSON api.

Introducing React Components

Let’s recap what we’ve done so far.

Let’s work on the React app that will turn our JSON into a beautiful blog post. I like to start with a completely hardcoded UI and work back incrementally from there until it connects with the JSON. We’ll start by deleting the Hello React app and replacing it with the real thing.

If you look under the app/javascript folder, you’ll see two packs.

We’ll delete hello_react.jsx and fix up the application pack to show our blog post. Webpacker gets its knickers in a twist when you delete a pack but stopping and starting webpack-dev-server will usually fix it.

I like to have a top-level Application component that act as a container for everything else. I also like to group my components by domain rather than the more usual functional buckets.

Let’s create the Application component and initialize it. I’ll explain what it is doing afterwards.

// javascript/Application.jsx
import React from 'react'

export function Application(_props) {
  return <div id='application'>
    <h1 className='site-name'>Blogging</h1>
    <h2 className='title'>React on Rails</h2>
    <div className='body'>I can use React with Rails.</div>
  </div>
}

A few things to note if you are new to React.

React has a syntax that looks a lot like HTML for describing views. But it’s not HTML, it’s JSX! It’s an extension to Javascript syntax that gets compiled into React components. It’s hard to love JSX and why anyone thought it was a good idea to write code with angle brackets in the 21st century, I have no idea. I thought I was done with remembering to close tags about ten years ago. Maybe I should learn Pug next.

The simplest React component is just a function that returns some JSX. That thing that looks a bit like a <div> tag with an id attribute… that will actually get compiled into code that creates a div component and sets the id property. React components are all about properties.

You may remember that HTML has a class attribute. But class is a reserved word in Javascript so React uses className instead (React components use camelCase for property names). You’ll remember this after you get it wrong the first 27 times.

The usual trick for bootstrapping a React app is to look for an element in the DOM and then render your React component inside it.

# javascript/application/index.jsx

import React from 'react'
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom'
import {Application} from './Application'

document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
  const react = document.querySelector('#react')
  ReactDOM.render(
      <Application />,
      react.appendChild(document.createElement('div'))
  )
})

Let’s put a div element with id=’react’ on our index page. We don’t need to include the javascript_pack_tag because the application layout file already includes it.

# index.html.erb
<div id='react' />

The last thing is to point the application pack file at our index.jsx.

import 'application'

If you import a folder, Javascript looks for an index.js (or index.jsx) file and runs that. If you have been following along, your javascript folder should look like this:

If you refresh your browser page now and it should look a bit like this:

So that’s our top level Application component done. In the next episode we’ll tidy it up a little and add some tests.

Wait a minute! It’s a post, man.

We’ll start with the Post model first.

I’ll keep the commentary to a minimum because you know this stuff already.

rails generate model Post title:string body:text
rails db:migrate

We’ll need a test framework. I like Minitest.

# Gemfile 
gem 'minitest', group: :test
bundle install

I use TDD but you can do whatever you like. I’m not your dad.

I’ll fast-forward though the details.

require 'test_helper'
class PostTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
  test 'a post has a title and a body' do
    post = Post.create! title: 'The title', body: 'The body.'
    assert_equal 'The title', post.title
    assert_equal 'The body.', post.body
  end
end
rails test

.E

Error:
PostsControllerTest#test_should_get_index:
NameError: undefined local variable or method `posts_index_url' for #<PostsControllerTest:0x00007f8939850650>
    test/controllers/posts_controller_test.rb:5:in `block in <class:PostsControllerTest>'

PostTest passes already but PostControllerTest is failing because the path is wrong. Let’s fix that.

require 'test_helper'
class PostsControllerTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
  test 'should get index' do
    get posts_url
    assert_response :success
  end
end
rails test

# Running:

..

Finished in 0.382970s, 5.2223 runs/s, 7.8335 assertions/s.
2 runs, 3 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

Our React app is going to need some JSON. Let’s add a show action to PostsController.

require 'test_helper'
class PostsControllerTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
  setup do
    @post = Post.create! title: 'The title', body: 'The body.'
  end

  test 'fetch a post as json' do
    get post_url(@post, format: :json)
    assert_response :success

    json = JSON.parse response.body, symbolize_names: true
    assert_equal @post.id, json[:id]
    assert_equal 'The title', json[:title]
    assert_equal 'The body.', json[:body]
  end
end
# PostsController.rb
class PostsController < ApplicationController
  before_action :set_post, only: :show
  
  private
  def set_post
    @post = Post.find params[:id]
  end
end

# views/posts/show.json.jbuilder
json.extract! @post, :id, :title, :body, :created_at, :updated_at

Let’s create a post so we can see what the JSON looks like.

# In the rails console
Post.create! title: 'React on Rails', body: 'I can use React with Rails.'
open http://localhost:3000/posts/1.json

That’s the back-end taken care of. We’ll build a React component to show our post tomorrow.

From zero to one

I have Ruby v2.6.6 installed using rvm and I’ll use Homebrew to install Node and Yarn on my Mac.

Installing software tends to either go swimmingly or you end up drowning in a Pool of Despair. In the Pool of Despair case, extra instructions don’t seem to help very much so I’ll keep mine to a minimum.

gem install rails
brew install node  # javascript runtime
brew install yarn  # javascript package manager

Yarn is the equivalent of rubygems in the Javascript ecosystem. We’ll use yarn to install node packages.

Open a terminal and go to that favourite part of your hard drive where you keep all your future dreams and create a rails project.

rails new blogging --database=postgresql --webpack=react --skip-turbolinks --skip-spring

I use PostgresSQL because it makes deploying to Heroku easier. Use SQLite or MySQL if you prefer.

I don’t like Turbolinks. Spring always pegs my CPU at 100% and I don’t know why.

–webpack=react will install Webpack and the node packages for React.

Webpack replaces Sprockets for processing Javascript assets but we’ll still use Sprockets for CSS because I haven’t figured out to use Webpack for CSS yet and everyone says it’s complicated.

I’m going to push everything to Github so I can link to the code online. I just created a repository at https://github.com/klawrence/blogging

cd blogging
git init
git add .
git commit -m 'Start blogging!'

git remote add origin https://klawrence@github.com/klawrence/blogging.git
git push -u origin master

If the install gods are on our side we can create the database, start the server and see the happy, happy Welcome to Rails banner.

rails db:create
rails server
open http://localhost:3000/

When we created our Rails project, Webpacker created a HelloReact app. We can use that to test that React installed correctly. We’ll create a posts controller to initialize HelloReact and we’ll set it as the home page in routes.rb.

rails generate controller Posts index
#routes.rb
Rails.application.routes.draw do
  root to: 'posts#index'
  resources :posts
end

Webpacker compiles javascript modules into packs and the javascript_pack_tag method will include your pack on a page. We’ll call it from the index page.

# views/posts/index.html.erb
<%= javascript_pack_tag 'hello_react' %>

Webpacker ships with a utility that rebuilds your packs and refreshes the page whenever you change any Javascript. We’ll run it in a terminal window.

bin/webpack-dev-server

Now, when I go to http://localhost:3000/, I see the message “Hello, React”. I hope you do too.

Everything is set up now and we’re ready to start coding. In the next episode, we’ll show our first blog post.

React on Rails

When I was first learning React I went through about 17 tutorials before I finally grokked what it was all about. Which is weird because React is quite simple really.

I’m gonna build the tutorial that I wished I’d had when I started learning it.

I’ll assume my reader knows Rails very well but knows just enough Javascript to add sprinkles. I won’t try to teach you React, but I’ll point you in the right direction to learn what you need to know.

Let’s do this.

But “Do what?” you may ask?

We are going to build a blogging platform. It’s going to be Rails on the back end and React on the front end. We’re going to test with Minitest, Jest and Enzyme as we go along. We’ll deploy it on Heroku. We’ll use CircleCI for continuous integration.

We are not going to use Redux. I have an idea for a more object-oriented state management system that leverages the rich metadata that Rails already has and, hopefully, avoids all the acres of boilerplate code that every other React tutorial seems to generate. I don’t have a design for this in mind. I’m hoping one will emerge as we go along.

Let’s start with a quick planning session. What do we want our blogging platform to do?

  • An author can publish a blog post.
  • A reader can read a blog post.
  • The home page shows a list of posts, most recent first.
  • An author can edit a blog post.
  • Readers can comment on a post.
  • Comment are held for moderation.
  • The author can approve comments.
  • Notify the author when there are comments.

At some point we’ll want to upload images and have multiple authors and fancy formatting and RSS feeds and other blogphernalia but that list is enough to get us started.

I’ll tackle the second story first because I like to start a project by having something working from end to end as quickly as possible and reading a post has fewer moving parts than creating one.

Join me here to get started.